VC authority page
How VC firms can enforce capital discipline across portfolios
Portfolio governance breaks when each company uses different threshold language, board packet formats, and escalation clocks. This guide gives VC firms a single operating system for posture standardization across portfolio companies.
Portfolio-wide framework
- 1. Standardize SAFE / RISKY / DANGEROUS commitment classes across every company.
- 2. Require one monthly posture memo format: state, breach signals, actions, and reversal readiness.
- 3. Use one escalation policy: two-checkpoint breach persistence triggers board-forwardable addendum.
- 4. Normalize reversibility language so rollback windows, owners, and communication sequencing are explicit.
Implementation model (first 90 days)
Days 1–30: baseline all companies against one governance rubric and identify taxonomy drift.
Days 31–60: roll out standardized board packet language and require exception logs with expiry dates.
Days 61–90: run cross-portfolio posture calibration and reversal drills, then lock common threshold definitions for one quarter.
Board-forwardable artifact block
Portfolio posture recommendation: maintain standardized governance language for two quarters before threshold recalibration.
Control rule: any breach lasting two checkpoints requires a board addendum with owner, action, and rollback timeline.
Capital discipline effect: tranche release is conditioned on comparable evidence packets across all portfolio companies.
Reversibility requirement: every irreversible commitment must include a contingency plan and explicit escalation authority.